Have you ever scrolled through Wikipedia and wondered, “Who wrote all this?” That curiosity puts you right in the world where services like Hire Wikipedia live. Every huge, endlessly long article you see is built on extensive yet careful research. It is also built on neat organization and seriously precise editing. And if you really want to see that in action, check on LongPages, the corner of Wikipedia that ranks the longest articles on the entire site.
Simply put, Special: LongPages lists the articles that contain the most source text (in number of bytes), which is updated in real time as editors change it. It is not a fixed list, but one that can always change with the changes in events, elections, lists, and by the editors themselves. To anyone who edits or updates Wikipedia pages as their job, this page is a kind of X-ray of the behavior of big, complex subjects on the platform.
The top 10 longest Wikipedia pages at present.
Currently, the largest pages on the English Wikipedia have a wide range, such as lists, elections, TV history and so on. As per Special: LongPages, the top 10 are as follows:
- List of chiropterans – an enormous bat list, which is approximately 739,824 bytes.
- Opinion polling, 2024 United Kingdom general election – Poll after poll (4,678,376 bytes).
- United States deaths 2023 – an in-depth death-notice index in 2023 (673,676 bytes).
- German federal election opinion polls, 2025 – yet another data-filled election site (658,195 bytes).
- 2023 in American television – a year of shows, seasons, and industry news (655,133 bytes).
- List of Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine nominees – a long and highly historic list (651,212 bytes).
- American Public Television programs list – a sink into distribution in public television (639,921 bytes).
- List of organisms named after notable people (born 1900-1949) – mix of science, celebrity and taxonomy (638,809 bytes).
- 2024 California United States House of Representatives elections – all races and results in a single state (627,212 bytes).
- List of Nintendo 3DS games – documenting a complete library of consoles in tedious detail (624,922 bytes).
This is the trend of the Wikipedia veterans: the longest pages are usually lists, chronologies, election or polling pages where structured data, references and tables inherit rapidly.
Why does the length of articles count?
Wikipedia even has an article size guideline, where very large pages are suggested to be divided to allow reading, loading and maintenance. As soon as an article becomes massive, a number of issues come into play:
- Navigation is challenging – readers have difficulties locating what they want amid a huge wall of content.
- Mobile or slow connections can cause technical performance to be compromised.
- The complexity of editing increases significantly: a greater number of references to be edited, more templates, and more chances of markup errors.
- The consensus management process becomes more difficult when pages are longer, there are more views, more discussion on the talk page, and more reliance on policy-sensitive editors.
This is important should you be a brand, a public figure, or an organization that is eager to enforce a serious presence on Wikipedia. You do not want your article to be chucked up, unreadable or constantly in need of cleaning up, but you do want it to be comprehensive, well-sourced and put up in a manner that it meets the expectations of the community.
What the longest pages can teach us about doing Wikipedia right.
Take another look at those top 10 monsters. They are long, though not random text dumps; they are well organised:
- Election polling pages are divided into content, by time period, by pollster, and by methodology, and are frequently presented with large tables and charts.
- Year in TV and year in video games pages are organized by month, network, genre, or region.
- Organism or nominee lists are organized into expectant, sortable lists such that the readers can scan and compare items quickly.
This type of structure does not come naturally. It is the work of senior editors who are familiar with the topic, and the style, templates and community conventions of Wikipedia.
For a client, that’s exactly what “hiring Wikipedia expertise” really means: not paying for promotion (which is against Wikipedia’s rules), but getting help from people who can navigate the platform’s policies, structure complex topics correctly, and keep articles neutral, sourced and maintainable.
Where Hire Wikipedia fits into the picture
Imagine you’re an organization with a long, complicated history; or a researcher whose work spans dozens of publications; or a project with huge amounts of structured data. Your Wikipedia article doesn’t need to be one of the top 10 longest pages, and it shouldn’t be, in most cases, but it does need to:
- Capture the full, verifiable scope of your story
- Be broken into logical sections and, if necessary, sister articles
- Use lists, infoboxes, navboxes and categories effectively
- Follow policies on neutrality, conflict of interest, and reliable sourcing
Services like Hire Wikipedia can help with exactly that kind of heavy lifting: researching references, proposing article structures, drafting neutral text, and suggesting splits when an article gets too long and needs to be broken out into subpages or “List of …” articles. All of that must still respect Wikipedia’s content policies and community expectations; nothing is guaranteed to stay if the wider editor community disagrees, but starting from a well-constructed, guideline-compliant draft makes a big difference.
Long doesn’t always mean better, but smart does
The LongPages leaderboard is fun to browse, but it’s not a contest you want to win. A 700-kilobyte bat list or election polling page makes sense because the subject is inherently huge and data-driven. For most biographies, company pages, or project overviews, the goal is not “be as long as possible,” but:
- Be complete but focused
- Use spin-off articles when a section grows too large
- Keep the main page readable and welcoming for non-expert readers
In other words: size is a signal, not a trophy. It tells you when a topic may need restructuring, more navigation, or even a family of related articles rather than one giant one.
And that’s where thoughtful Wikipedia work, the kind of work a professional Wikipedia consultant or team does, really shines. The top 10 longest pages show what happens when complexity meets persistence. Hire Wikipedia-style support makes sure that when your topic grows, it grows the right way: sourced, structured and sustainable, not just big.
